|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JASON-1 campaign |
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
JASON SLR analysis JASON DORIS analysis |
For the 11-day period of the CHAMP orbit campaign the available orbit solutions have been used as fixed input orbit in a process to compute the SLR tracking data residuals. The software used at ESOC for this analysis is based on the system that is also used operationally for satellites like ERS and is completely independent of the POD systems that were used for any of the orbit solutions, including the ESA solution. These SLR residuals should therefore form a useful independent check of the orbit quality.
The three-dimensional orbit error at the time of the SLR observation will hardly ever be oriented along the line of sight between tracking station and satellite. This means that the SLR residuals form a lower limit to the 3D orbit error, assuming that the SLR residual is predominantly due to orbit error.
The following data editing has been applied:
Table 1 below presents the overall SLR residual statistics for each included orbit solution.
The SLR residuals have been plotted in a single figure per contributed orbit solution. Please click on the icons below to obtain the larger Figures. Due to the 11-day time scale, the laser tracking passes are compressed into near-vertical lines in these Figures, which conveniently translates into a mean value with an error bar for each pass. The small images here already show that the SLR residuals increase from the currently most precise solution onwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEOS |
CSR |
TUM |
GFZ |
JPL |
GRGS |
NCL |
ASI |
AIUB |
CNES |
ESA |
UCAR |
UNB |
Figure 2: SLR residuals per contributed orbit solution (2-way range)